<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Look at That 800 Pound Apache Hiding in the Corner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.temme.net/sander/2007/08/03/800-gb-apache/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.temme.net/sander/2007/08/03/800-gb-apache/</link>
	<description>Open Source, Apache, Apple, Cloud and maybe even some Crypto stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:59:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sander</title>
		<link>http://www.temme.net/sander/2007/08/03/800-gb-apache/comment-page-1/#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>sander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 00:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.temme.net/sander/2007/08/03/800-gb-apache/#comment-353</guid>
		<description>While it makes sense to me to allocate a request-specific bucket brigade out of memory that is tied to that request, this particular patch won&#039;t do you any good because ptrans is itself a subpool of pchild.  In any case, perhaps I wasn&#039;t clear enough in my original post: the server rapidly balloons to 800Mb and then stays there.  It does not actually leak memory, although on a box that doesn&#039;t have the RAM to accomodate such an elephant this will end badly before it hits its comfort zone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it makes sense to me to allocate a request-specific bucket brigade out of memory that is tied to that request, this particular patch won&#8217;t do you any good because ptrans is itself a subpool of pchild.  In any case, perhaps I wasn&#8217;t clear enough in my original post: the server rapidly balloons to 800Mb and then stays there.  It does not actually leak memory, although on a box that doesn&#8217;t have the RAM to accomodate such an elephant this will end badly before it hits its comfort zone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davi Arnaut</title>
		<link>http://www.temme.net/sander/2007/08/03/800-gb-apache/comment-page-1/#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>Davi Arnaut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 19:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.temme.net/sander/2007/08/03/800-gb-apache/#comment-352</guid>
		<description>There are a few PRs on bugzilla regarding this &quot;memory leak&quot; on Windows. Try this patch:

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11427#c7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a few PRs on bugzilla regarding this &#8220;memory leak&#8221; on Windows. Try this patch:</p>
<p><a href="http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11427#c7" rel="nofollow">http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11427#c7</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

